← Decision guides

Should we use AWS or GCP for our infrastructure?

For most teams, the specific cloud matters less than the plan says it does — both cover the core primitives well. The real decision is usually whether a switch is worth the migration cost, not which platform wins in the abstract.

Ask the AI panel this question →

Free to try. GPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek answer independently.

What actually decides it

  • Switching cost if you're already deployed

    Data egress, re-architecting managed-service dependencies and retraining the team are real, often underestimated costs. Migrating needs a specific, quantified reason.

  • Team's existing experience

    Deep familiarity with one platform's IAM, networking and quirks is worth more in practice than a marginal feature advantage on the other.

  • Specific service fit

    If your workload leans on a particular managed service (e.g. a specific data warehouse, ML pipeline, or GPU availability), let that drive the decision over general platform reputation.

  • Multi-cloud is a cost, not a hedge, at small scale

    Running both 'just in case' usually means neither is used well. Pick one and get good at it until there's a concrete reason not to.

What would change the answer

  • A quantified cost/performance gap for your actual workload
  • Credits or committed-spend agreements that change the economics
  • A hard dependency on a service only one platform offers well

Get a verdict on your situation

Generic advice only goes so far. Add your numbers and see where four leading AI models agree, where they split, and what could change the answer.

Ask Consense →

One decision breakdown a week

A real decision run through four AI models: where they agreed, where they split, and what would change the answer. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

More decision guides